Knowledge, truth and Real: the writing of the not-all in analytic discourse
analyst discourse, object a, Real, knowledge, truth.
This research seeks to investigate a possible relationship between knowledge-truth-Real – taken as a conceptual triplet, as proposed by Alain Badiou – and the analyst's discourse, having as a background the assumption of a not-all psychoanalysis. In this way, we start from the following questions: is the statute of the Real, when organized at the level of three with knowledge and truth, potentiated in the analytical discourse? Considering the arrangement of the letters in the places determined by the theory of discourses, what would contribute to this potentialization, marking the Real in the analytical discourse? Thus, the objective is to analyze how the Real circulates in the analytical discourse in its inseparability with knowledge and truth, emphasizing that such discourse, as Lacan says, makes the Real touch the Real. The research proposal, therefore, touches on the theory of discourses in its interface with the thought of Alain Badiou, insofar as it proposes to analyze the conceptual triplet knowing-truth-Real in the dynamics of the analyst's discourse. In view of this proposal, we walk through the terrain of logical-mathematical writing, understanding that our methodological approach goes through what is written in the mathematics of analytical discourse. And it is in the face of this writing property that we organize our hypothesis, understanding that object a, situated in the position of agent of the analytical discourse, could be the term capable of writing the turn of the Real that makes this discourse differentiate itself from the others and, also, to be the equivalent term for the Real in Badiou's triplet, adding to knowledge and truth.