Banca de DEFESA: LÍVIA FRANCIELE DA SILVEIRA DONINI GRASSMANN

Uma banca de DEFESA de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
STUDENT : LÍVIA FRANCIELE DA SILVEIRA DONINI GRASSMANN
DATE: 10/09/2021
TIME: 14:00
LOCAL: https://meet.google.com/dgq-uhyr-jzw
TITLE:

Hate speech vs. freedom of expression in legal discourse: the case of quilombolas

KEY WORDS:

Discourse. Freedom. Limitation. Crime. Sanction. Analyze.

PAGES: 127
BIG AREA: Lingüística, Letras e Artes
AREA: Lingüística
SUBÁREA: Lingüística Aplicada
SUMMARY:

This present study has as its theme the hate speech in opposition to the freedom of expression on the Analysis of the Legal Discourse and the case of the natives that occurred with the federal deputy JairMessiasBolsonaro, current president of the Republic in Brazil. This master's thesis seeks to portray the structure of the speech and how he was acquitted in the face of a clearly xenophobic and racist phrase and expression issued by the deputy who was understood to be a speech that was not endowed with crime because it was in a political campaign and that it was not possible maintain a conviction in this regard. Several questions arise within this constitution of discourse analysis, and for this reason, the development of this thesis is based on investigating and presenting arguments that reflect the need to limit freedom of expression in order to prevent cases of hate speech in Brazil. Within this conception, this thesis was divided into four chapters. The first chapter is based on the structure of the judiciary in the Federal Constitution of 1988. Subsequently, it examines the Critical Discourse Analysis, considering a theoretical-methodological approach of the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), its basic concepts, the three-dimensional model exposed by the author Norman Fairclough, in addition to appreciating about the means and symbols of power and ways of operationalizing ideology. Also in this same chapter, it is a question of investigating and succinctly presenting the argumentative operators and intertextuality and, finally, the Critical Analysis of Legal Discourse. In chapter three it is inferred to elucidate about hate speech versus freedom of expression. And finally, considering the previous analysis before a summary of the object of analysis that refer to the actions that was judged JairMessiasBolsonaro and the case of natives. The methodology used is based on considering a qualitative analysis, highlighting the doctrines and scientific articles duly published, sharing their understandings and positions that, invariably, are exposed in a political, social, and legal way in relation to the case in question, in addition to documentally review the processes in the judiciary that analyzed the deputy's conduct. The construction of the text was entirely based on the authors' considerations, and, in the end, the author's position is highlighted to seek to build a more adequate Brazilian scenario due to hate speech crimes.

BANKING MEMBERS:
Presidente - 1544164 - CLAUDIO MARCIO DO CARMO
Interna - 2141488 - NADIA DOLORES FERNANDES BIAVATI
Externa à Instituição - GLENDA CRISTINA VALIM DE MELO - UNIRIO